Several years ago, a as relatively new
food and beverage supervisor, Giles had the opportunity to work under a very
unorthodox F&B manager. He was only at that hotel for a few months, but he
learned a great deal from Mr. C. He still remembers several management
principles and words of wisdom.
Once such expression Giles recalls even
today. ‘Mr C told me once that there are two types of manager; those that
entered the industry and made their way up the ladder so that they could call
themselves ‘managers’ and are able to say that ‘I work in management’. The
others entered the industry, and learned about the hospitality industry as they
made their way up the ladder, and took the time to understand how the industry
works and operated. After their slower climb up the ladder, they become
leaders, not managers, and their insight and understanding of the industry is
invaluable.’
Giles also goes further with Mr C’s words
of wisdom. He ventures that the “two types of managers” theorem can be
expanded, and goes so far as to engage with theories of leadership and
management.
The matter of good leadership, people
management, and essentially what makes a good leader has been debated over
centuries by theorists and professionals alike, across all industries and
sectors. The head accountant is as eager to be a good leader as is the Army
General. Politicians would benefit from leadership master classes just as much
as a hospital consultant would.
For Giles, the ‘different kinds of
manager’ question is simple; those who treat their staff well, and those who
don’t.
One type of manager is business focused.
They put profit before all else- quite rightly so, because they are running a
business. Working hours, working conditions, holidays, staff issues and
requests go by the board, as the restaurant or hotel simply needs to turn over
tables, and to get people staying there, and dining there. Staff know that
their issues will not be listened to, or if they are, they will take a back
number to the needs of the business. All that matters to the manager is the
staff turning up on time for their shift, working hard, then going home after
many hours of overtime. However, the business is successful, and that manager
gets a pat on the back for his profit margins and productivity.
The other kind of manager is the
opposite. For them, the needs of the business are secondary. Their staff are
treated well, and are put first. They will always have time for their staff,
will always be there to help them through tough times, will always have their
back in any work related issue or dispute. For those mangers, an after shift
drink is important for staff morale, instead of an expense to be accounted for.
Giles recalls one Central European
manager he worked for once with great pleasure. ‘He was inspirational. He was
very open about putting his staff first, and in being there for them, both at
work and out of work. He stated that the customers were our responsibility and
job, and that his job was us. That was his philosophy.’ That manager benefited
from staff who were dedicated and loyal to him, and would go that extra mile
for him, knowing that he was there looking out for them. As such, it was a very
happy and dynamic team, a team that smashed every challenge handed to them by
the hotel’s management, and generated a healthy profit for the hotel.

The staff held her in contempt, and
actually often concealed information or issues from her. They knew that
involving her in matters was often detrimental, so they banded together, and
worked together, often excluding here. ‘The relationship between staff and
manager was very cordial, but it was also very strained, and tense. She,
however, could not see that.’
Giles ventures that there are two other
types of managers in addition. When I query as to what those styles of
leadership are, he smiles enigmatically.
‘Another time, William. That is for
another post.’
No comments:
Post a Comment